# Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Statement of Policy 2001-1: Clarification of Statement of Policy 1999-1 Regarding Lender Payments to Mortgage Brokers, and Guidance Concerning Unearned Fees Under Section 8(b)
> **US Department of Housing and Urban Development** · Statement of Policy 2001-1. · Published 2001-10-18 · 66 FR 53052
## Document
- **Document number:** 01-26321
- **Category:** hud-housing-vouchers
- **Agency:** US Department of Housing and Urban Development
- **Federal Register citation:** 66 FR 53052
- **CFR reference:** 24 CFR 3500
- **Publication date:** 2001-10-18
- **Docket:** Docket No. FR-4714-N-01
## Abstract

This Statement of Policy is being issued to eliminate any ambiguity concerning the Department's position with respect to those lender payments to mortgage brokers characterized as yield spread premiums and to overcharges by settlement service providers as a result of questions raised by two recent court decisions, Culpepper v. Irwin Mortgage Corp. and Echevarria v. Chicago Title and Trust Co., respectively. In issuing this Statement of Policy, the Department clarifies its interpretation of Section 8 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) in Statement of Policy 1999-1 Regarding Lender Payments to Mortgage Brokers (the 1999 Statement of Policy), and reiterates its long-standing interpretation of Section 8(b)'s prohibitions. Culpepper v. Irwin Mortgage Corp. involved the payment of yield spread premiums from lenders to mortgage brokers. Echevarria v. Chicago Title and Trust Co. involved the applicability of Section 8(b) to a settlement service provider that overcharged a borrower for the service of another settlement service provider, and then retained the amount of the overcharge. Today's Statement of Policy reiterates the Department's position that yield spread premiums are not per se legal or illegal, and clarifies the test for the legality of such payments set forth in HUD's 1999 Statement of Policy. As stated there, HUD's position that lender payments to mortgage brokers are not illegal per se does not imply, however, that yield spread premiums are legal in individual cases or classes of transactions. The legality of yield spread premiums turns on the application of HUD's test in the 1999 Statement of Policy as clarified today. The Department also reiterates its long-standing position that it may violate Section 8(b) and HUD's implementing regulations: (1) For two or more persons to split a fee for settlement services, any portion of which is unearned; or (2) for one settlement service provider to mark-up the cost of the services performed or goods p

## Source
- [Federal Register document](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2001/10/18/01-26321/real-estate-settlement-procedures-act-statement-of-policy-2001-1-clarification-of-statement-of)
---
*MORVS · CC0 1.0*