6/10/2008 - ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ISSUED. ORDER ALLEGES: RESPONDENT VIOLATED MULTIPLE PARTS OF THE PERMIT. IN VIOLATION OF CWA SECTIONS OF 301 & 402. DURING THE CSWEI, EPA INSPECTORS OBSERVED THE FOLLOWING: THE RESPONDENT FAILED TO INCLUDE IN THE NOI UP TO FOUR (4) APPLICABLE SIC CODES FOR ITS CO-LOCATED ACTIVITIES, AS REQUIRED PARTS II.D, III.C AND II.B.8 OF THE PERMIT. THE NOI ALSO FAILED TO NOTE ALL OF THE OUTFALLS FROM THE FACILITY. THE RESPONDENT FAILED TO INCLUDE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING IN ITS SWPPP: 1)THE SWPPP WAS NOT SIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART IV.B.1 OF THE PERMIT. 2) THE SWPPP DOES NOT INCLUDE INFORMATATION REGARDING DISCHARGES SUBJECT TO EPCRA SECTION 313, AS REQUIRED BY PART IV.E. OF THE PERMIT. 3) THE SWPPP DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL OF THE POTENTIAL SOURCES OF POLLUTION FROM ITS TENANTS, AS REQUIRED BY PART XI.Q.3.a(2) OF THE PRMIT. 4) THE SITE MAP DID NOT CONTAIN PORTIONS OF THE DRAINAGE AREA OF EACH STORM WATER OUTALL; ALL LOCATIONS WHERE SIGNIFICANT MATERIALS ARE EXPOSED TO PRECIPITATION; ALL LOCATIONS OF ENGINE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR, PAINTING, SANDING, LOADING/UNLOADING AREA; ALL OUTFALL LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF DISCHARGES CONTAINED; OR A PREDICTION OF THE DIRECTION OF FLOW, AS REQUIRED BY PART XI.Q.3.a(2) OF THE PERMIT. 5) A COMPLETE INVENTORY OF ALL TYPES OF MATERIALS HANDLED AT THE SITE, FOR A PERIOD OF THREE (3) YEARS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF THE NOI, WAS NOT INCLUDED, AS REQUIRED BY PART XI.Q.3.a(2)(b) OF THE PERMIT. THE INVENTORY SHOULD SHOULD INCLU