POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS: 1. RESPONDENT CALCULATED THAT IT HAD THE POTENTIAL TO EXCEED THE VOC EMISSIONS STANDARD OF 100 TONS PER YEAR, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 308 OF THE CAA. RESPONDENT HAD PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED A CATALYTIC OXIDIZER AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE BUT, BECAUSE IT DID NOT HAVE A CAA PERMIT, THE REDUCTION OF EMISSIONS PROVIDED BY THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE COULD NOT BE APPLIED TO THE POTENTIAL TO EMIT VOC'S, THUS RESULTING IN A TECHNICAL EXCEEDANCE OF VOC EMISSIONS. METROWEB SUBMITTED A COMPLETE CAA PERMIT APPLICATION TO THE STATE ON 2/18/99. 2. RESPONDENT FAILED TO SUBMIT TIER II FORMS FOR INK STORAGE IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 312 OF EPCRA, AND FAILED TO SUBMIT A NOTIFICATION TO THE LOCAL EMERGENCY PLANNING COMMISSION IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 302 OF EPCRA. METROWEB NOTIFIED THE LEPC OF INK STORAGE IN EXCESS OF 10,000 POUNDS, AND FILED ALL PAST DUE EPCRA TIER II FORMS. 3. METROWEB BELIEVED IT MAY HAVE FAILED TO NOTIFY THE THE STATE OF ITS STATUS AS A SMALL QUALTITY GENERATOR OF HAZARDOUS WASTE UNDER RCRA. AFTER REVIEWING ITS WASTE GENERATION, METROWEB CONFIRMED THAT IT DID NOT GENERATE GREATER THAN 220 POUNDS PER MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AND THEREFORE DID NOT VIOLATE THE RCRA NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT. 4. METROWEB BELIEVED IT MAY HAVE EX