← EPA enforcement cases

Unimatic Manufacturing Corporation et al.

Judicial · FY2020 · — · Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery · 3602295093

—
Penalty
—
Cost recovery
—
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
02-2020-0002
Type
Judicial
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
Multimedia
—
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (4)

Summary

Defendant operated an aluminum die casting facility at the Site from 1955 to 2001. During that time, the Defendant used lubricating oils containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the die casting operation that were released into the environment through drains, pipes, and other means. In April 2002, the Defendant sold the property at 25 Sherwood Lane in Fairfield, New Jersey to Cardean, LLC (Cardean). EPA is seeking reimbursement of response costs pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9601, et seq. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) has joined the consent decree as a co-plaintiff. On May 6, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey entered a consent decree which resolves the United States? claims against the Defendants. Working with DOJ, EPA negotiated an ability-to-pay settlement with Unimatic and ?peripheral party? settlements with the other three parties. Under the consent decree, Unimatic is to pay $3,499,198.65 -- 90% of which will go to EPA and the other 10%, to the state of New Jersey (consistent with the two agencies' respective shares of the cleanup costs). Unimatic will also pay $900,000 to Cardean, who will use some of the funds to pay off the back taxes on the property and give EPA a first priority lien on it. After EPA cleans up the site, Cardean will sell the property and pay the net proceeds to EPA.

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown