← EPA enforcement cases

PRESTIGE PROPERTIES, INC., AN OKLAHOMA CORPORATION

Administrative - Formal · FY1998 · — · Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication · 38048

—
Penalty
—
Cost recovery
—
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
06-1998-0354
Type
Administrative - Formal
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Multimedia
N
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (1)

Summary

1. SECTION 309(A) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ), 33 U.S.C. SECTION 1319(A). 2. PRESTIGE PROPERTIES, INC., AN OKLAHOMA CORPORATION FACILITY: OAK HILL RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION FACILITY EAST 114TH STREET, SOUTH OF SOUTH SANDUSKY TULSA, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA 74100 3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 301 OF THE CWA BY CONDUCTING THE RELEVANT ACTIVITIES AND OPERATING THE FA- CILITY WITHOUT NPDES PERMIT COVERAGE. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 309(A) OF THE CWA, EPA ISSUED AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (AO) TO THE RTESPONDENT. THE AO ORDERS THE RESPONDENT TO: A) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AO, MAKE A COMPLETE AND CORRECT AP- PLICATION FOR NPDES PERMIT COVERAGE, SUBMIT A COPY OF THE APPLICATION, CONFIRMATION OF COVERAGE, AND THE PERMIT NUMBER TO EPA, B) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE AO, TAKE WHATEVER CORRECTIVE ACTION IS NECESSARY TO CORRECT THE DEFICIEN- CIES AND ELIMINATE AND PREVENT RECURRENCE OF THE VIOLA- TIONA CITED, AND TO XOME INTO COMPLIANCE WITH ALL OF THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT, C) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE AO, SUBMIT A WRITTEN REPORT DETAILING THE SPECIFIC ACTIONS TAKEN TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS AND EXPLAINING WHY SUCH ACTIONS ARE ANTICIPATED TO BE SUFFICIENT TO PRE- VENT RECURRENCE OF THE VIOLATIONS, D) IF THE PERMITTEE BELIEVES COMPLETE CORRECTION OF T

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown