← EPA enforcement cases

DALE POLEDNA SPRING CREEK CONOCO (DPE, INC.)

Administrative - Formal · FY1993 · — · Final Order With Penalty · 49617

$6K
Penalty
—
Cost recovery
—
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
08-1993-0175
Type
Administrative - Formal
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Final Order With Penalty
Multimedia
N
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (1)

Summary

DURING AN INSPECTION BY AN EPA AUTHORIZED INSPECTOR IN AUGUST 1992, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT RESPONDENT FAILED TO PROVIDE A LEAK DETECTION METHOD FOR THE THREE PRESSURIZED UNDERGROUND PIPING SYSTEMS CONNECTED TO THE THREE UST'S WHICH WERE INSTALLED IN 1976. THIS IS A 6 COUNT COMPLAINT WITH A PROPOSED CIVIL PENALTY OF $12,108. COMPLIANCE ORDER-8/04/93 1.RESPONDENT SHALL INSTALL AN AUTOMATIC FLOW OR SHUT-OFF DEVICE FOR EACH OF THE PIPING SYSTEMS IN USE AT THE SPRING CREEK CONOCO FACILITY AND PROVIDE EPA WITH CERTIFIED VERIFI- CATION WITHIN 60 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLIANCE ORDER. 2.RESPONDENT SHALL BEGIN UTILIZING A LEAK DETECTION METHOD ACCORDING TO 40 CFR 280.41(B)(1)(II) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLIANCE ORDER. PROPOSED PENALTY OF $18,108.

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown