{"url_path":"/sec/blnk/10-q/2026/item-1","section_key":"item-1","section_title":"Item 1 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.  **","topic":"sec","document":{"doc_type":"10-Q","doc_date":"2026-05-11","source_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1429764/0001493152-26-022266-index.html","accession_number":"0001493152-26-022266","cik":"0001429764","ticker":"BLNK","issuer_name":"Blink Charging Co.","edgar_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1429764/0001493152-26-022266-index.html","primary_entity_key":"0001429764","primary_entity_name":"Blink Charging Co."},"word_count":297,"has_tables":true,"body_markdown":"**ITEM\n1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.  **\n\n \n\nFor\na description of our legal proceedings, see Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies – Litigation, Disputes, and Settlements\nin Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.\n\n \n\nThe Farkas\nGroup, Inc. (“FGI”), a Florida corporation whose principal is former Company CEO, Michael D. Farkas, filed a demand for\narbitration on April 1, 2024, alleging that the Company owes FGI commissions pursuant to a November 17, 2009 commission agreement\nbetween the parties. The amount of commission was not stated but application of the theories articulated in the pleading would have\nrequired payment of more than $20 million in commissions. The Company filed an answer denying the claim and counterclaimed against\nFGI, Mr. Farkas, and one of his companies, NextNRG Holdings (“NEXT”), alleging that FGI, Mr. Farkas, and NEXT are in\nviolation of non-compete agreements. NEXT later filed a petition with the Florida Superior Court to stay the arbitration as to NEXT.\nThe Florida Court denied NEXT’s petition, and the arbitration resumed in March 2025. The arbitration hearing occurred in\nAugust 2025. In October 2025, the Arbitrator issued an interim award which rejected many of the theories advocated by FGI and\nrequires the Company to provide an accounting within 90 days applying the Arbitrator’s determinations regarding the Commission\nAgreement. The Arbitrator denied the Company’s claim for injunctive relief. The Arbitrator declined to award attorneys’\nfees to either party. The Company later prepared the accounting which resulted in a final award requiring the Company to pay\napproximately $72,000, plus quarterly commissions on revenue derived from certain chargers installed prior to June 30, 2017. The\nCompany estimates the quarterly payments will be less than $10,000 per quarter, declining over time to zero. The first payment\nwas approximately $10,000 and paid in April 2026."}